Talk:IBOPE Zogby International

merge

much of the data found in the John Zogby#Career section is more appropriated suited for this article. anyone willing to take this on? --emerson7 21:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Research

I like that this page mentions political polls and opinion polls, but research? I think the term is too "scientific" and can be misleading because it makes Zogby seem like a legitimate source for information.

The logical fallacy of the polls put forth by Zogby are simple: Zogby only allows responders to answer with multiple choice, predetermined answers. (ie Who will you vote for US president? John McCain or Barack Obama? No other choice is given and should the pollee answer with "Ralph Nader" it is recorded as "undecided.") Regardless of opinion, that is not undecided and negates the assertion that this is research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BFritzen (talk • contribs) 22:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pitiful article. There are several lines about the company and then it gives 3 or 4 paragraphs of criticism without any notice or heading. Hell even this "discussion" section needs a rewrite since the people above me are conducting their own original research. Surcer (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding a criticism section but it will need some help. I'm also deleting the crap that was obviously added by Zogby International or a right-winger who likes Zogby's extreme bias. Redsxfenway (talk) 15:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]